Criminal Justice Part 2 (Primary Research Study)
There is a troubling lack of transparency from the creators of the models discussed in Part 1 regarding the factors that get incorporated into the algorithms. Neither details about computational techniques or anonymized data have been released to researchers (Eckhouse, 2017), meaning that the models’ accuracy and biases cannot be properly evaluated. Until they can, the public is left to make their own decisions about whether it is ethical to have sentencing decisions informed by a computer model. In the face of this lack of public knowledge (for good reason) regarding data science in criminal justice, it is critical to both inform others of what is taking place in police departments nationwide and to survey their opinions on the technology given this new information. Research has shown that the more the public is aware of the procedures their local police are using, the more receptive they are to new ideas and the more comfortable they feel having conversations with law enforcement